Five decades of interaction between the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Court of Justice – Reversal of the Solange decisions – Jurisdictional upgrade of the Charter under domestic constitutional law – Continuity of the ultra vires and constitutional identity caveats – Differences between the First and Second Senate in the approach towards EU law – Preliminary references as a new normality – Projection of the experience and doctrinal rigour of the German fundamental rights case law on the European level – ‘Primary’ application of the Grundgesetz as pragmatic guidance – Gradual evolution of overarching standards – Ordinary courts as an institutional counterbalance to the Bundesverfassungsgericht – Insistence on leeway for relative national autonomy in the interpretation and application of the Charter.

中文翻译：

---

友好收购，或：“第一句话”的力量。德国宪法法院将基本权利宪章作为国内司法审查的标准

Bundesverfassungsgericht 和法院之间的五年互动 – 逆转索朗日决定 – 根据国内宪法对宪章的管辖权升级 – 宪章的连续性越权和宪法身份警告 – 第一和第二参议院在处理欧盟法律方面的差异 – 作为新常态的初步参考 – 在欧洲层面投射德国基本权利判例法的经验和教义严谨性 – Grundgesetz 作为务实的指导 – 总体标准的逐步演变 – 普通法院作为对 Bundesverfassungsgericht 的制度制衡 – 坚持在解释和适用《宪章》方面为相对民族自治留有余地。