Karin de Boer has given the best account so far of the reform of Wolffian metaphysics that Kant promised. But does such a reform cohere with the revolutionary goal that Kant also affirmed? Standpoint is singled out as the central meta-concept of Kant’s revolutionary goal, and it is argued that, in the second and third critiques, Kant himself developed his revolutionary insight into the perspectival character of both concept and judgement in ways that he did not anticipate at the time of the first critique, when his promise to reform metaphysics was made. The question is raised what room Kant’s revolution leaves for doctrinal and not merely disciplinary judgements in both general and special metaphysics, and also whether the opening of new vistas may have drained metaphysical reform of its interest.

迄今为止，卡琳·德波尔对康德承诺的沃尔夫形而上学的改革给出了最好的解释。但是这样的改革是否与康德也肯定的革命目标相一致呢？立场被挑出来作为康德革命目标的核心元概念，并且有人认为，在第二次和第三次批判中，康德本人以他没有预料到的方式发展了他对概念和判断的透视特征的革命性洞察力在第一次批评时，他承诺改革形而上学。提出了一个问题，康德的革命为一般和特殊形而上学中的教义判断而不仅仅是纪律判断留出了什么空间，以及新视野的开放是否可能已经耗尽了形而上学改革的兴趣。