In clinical psychopathology research, up to seven traits have been suggested as instances of antagonistic psychopathology. Those antagonistic traits, in turn, are commonly viewed as reflections of low Agreeableness as per the Big Five (BF-AG). However, specific theoretical differences between antagonistic traits suggest that other broad, basic dimensions beyond BF-AG ought to provide further points of correspondence. Specifically, whereas primarily affective antagonistic traits are closely aligned with BF-AG, primarily behavioral antagonistic traits are better aligned with Honesty-Humility (HH) from the HEXACO model and primarily cognitive antagonistic traits are better aligned with the common core of aversive traits (the Dark Factor of Personality, D). Indeed, from a theoretical perspective, D seems to be the only candidate sufficiently covering all aspects of antagonistic traits (affect, behavior, and cognition) to a comparable extent and thus affording a balanced representation of antagonistic psychopathology. We critically test these conjectures in a large and heterogeneous online sample (N = 3,396), investigating the overlap between antagonistic traits and basic personality via structural equation modeling. Results show that BF-AG, HH, and D each yield particularly strong ties to one group of antagonistic traits (affective, behavioral, and cognitive, respectively), while D offers the most balanced representation of all (groups of) antagonistic traits.

中文翻译：

---

超越（低）宜人性：更全面地理解对抗性精神病理学

在临床精神病理学研究中，多达七种特征被认为是对抗性精神病理学的实例。反过来，这些对抗性特征通常被视为五巨头（BF-AG）低宜人性的反映。然而，对抗性特征之间的具体理论差异表明，BF-AG 之外的其他广泛的基本维度应该提供进一步的对应点。具体来说，虽然主要的情感对抗性特质与 BF-AG 密切相关，但主要的行为性对抗性特质更符合 HEXACO 模型中的诚实-谦逊（HH），而主要的认知对抗性特质更符合厌恶性特质的共同核心（人格的黑暗因素，D）。确实，从理论上讲，D 似乎是唯一一个在相当程度上充分涵盖了对抗性特征（情感、行为和认知）的所有方面的候选者，从而提供了对抗性精神病理学的平衡表示。我们在大型且异质的在线样本中严格测试这些猜想（N  = 3,396），通过结构方程模型研究对抗性特征和基本人格之间的重叠。结果表明，BF-AG、HH 和 D 每个都与一组对抗性特征（分别为情感、行为和认知）产生特别强的联系，而 D 提供了所有（组）对抗性特征的最平衡表示。