We address how to ethically evaluate workplace practices when workplace behavioral norms conflict with employees’ attitudes toward those norms, which, according to research on psychological contract violations, regularly occurs. Drawing on Scanlonian contractualism, we introduce the intersubjective reflection process (IR process). The IR process ethically evaluates workplace practices according to whether parties to a workplace practice have intersubjectively valid grounds to veto the practice. We present normative and empirical justification for this process and apply the IR process to accounts of workplace moral dilemmas. We end by identifying future directions for research related to the IR process.

我们解决了当工作场所行为规范与员工对这些规范的态度发生冲突时如何从道德上评估工作场所实践的问题，根据对违反心理契约的研究，这种情况经常发生。借鉴斯堪伦契约主义，我们介绍了主体间反思过程（IR 过程）。IR 过程根据工作场所实践的各方是否具有主体间有效的理由来否决该实践，从道德上评估工作场所实践。我们为这一过程提供了规范和实证的理由，并将 IR 过程应用于工作场所道德困境的说明。最后，我们确定了与 IR 过程相关的研究的未来方向。