Analyzing ancient cosmopolitanism we can identify the various groups of interests behind contemporary globalization models. There are three directions in contemporary cosmopolitanism: egalitarian, libertarian, and mondialistic. Each of them is associated with a certain ancient school – the Cynics, Cyrenaics, Stoics. Each of these three lines has a definite social basis both in Antiquity and in the Age of Globalization. Cosmopolitanism is considered as a universal in time and space philosophical doctrine and ideological principia. Looking at cosmopolitanism through global-historical perspective, we can see its unchanged, permanent essence, which does not depend on concrete conditions. This article looks at ancient cosmopolitanism as a folded (latent) programme of globalization. Using the global-historical approach and the method of historical analogues the author reveals social and philosophical roots of contemporary cosmopolitanism in Antiquity. Some parallels between Hellenistic ethics and Confucian cosmopolitanism are drawn. The directions of ancient cosmopolitanism are compared to those of present.

分析古代世界主义，我们可以识别出当代全球化模式背后的各种利益集团。当代世界主义有三个方向：平等主义、自由主义和世界主义。他们每个人都与某个古老的学派有关——犬儒派、昔兰尼派、斯多葛派。这三条线中的每一条线在古代和全球化时代都有明确的社会基础。世界主义被认为是一种普遍的时空哲学学说和意识形态原则。从全球历史的角度看世界主义，我们可以看到它不变的、永恒的本质，它不依赖于具体的条件。本文将古代世界主义视为全球化的折叠（潜在）计划。作者使用全球历史方法和历史类比方法揭示了古代当代世界主义的社会和哲学根源。希腊化伦理与儒家世界主义之间存在一些相似之处。古代世界主义的方向与现在的方向进行了比较。