Slaton and Hanley (2016) compared the effects of multiple and chained schedules on stereotypy and item engagement for 2 individuals who exhibited automatically maintained motor stereotypy. Contingent access to motor stereotypy (i.e., chained schedules) was more effective than time-based access (i.e., multiple schedules) at reducing motor stereotypy, increasing item engagement, and establishing stimulus control for both participants. We systematically replicated Slaton and Hanley with 2 participants by a) targeting vocal stereotypy, b) including response interruption and redirection as a treatment component across conditions, c) conducting sessions in the natural environment with teaching assistants as change agents, and d) conducting an analysis of the effective treatment component(s). Chained schedules were more effective for 1 participant, whereas both treatments were effective for the other participant. The component analysis showed that different components were necessary for effective treatment for each participant.

中文翻译：

---

RIRD 治疗声音刻板印象的链式和多个时间表的比较

Slaton 和 Hanley (2016) 比较了 2 个表现出自动保持运动刻板印象的人的多重和链式日程安排对刻板印象和项目参与的影响。在减少运动刻板印象、增加项目参与和为两个参与者建立刺激控制方面，对运动刻板印象的偶然访问（即链式时间表）比基于时间的访问（即多个时间表）更有效。我们通过以下方式系统地复制了 Slaton 和 Hanley 与 2 名参与者：a）针对声音刻板印象，b）包括响应中断和重定向作为跨条件的治疗组件，c）在自然环境中与助教作为变革推动者进行会话，以及 d）进行有效治疗成分的分析。链式日程安排对 1 名参与者更有效，而两种治疗对另一名参与者都有效。成分分析表明，不同的成分对于每个参与者的有效治疗都是必要的。