In the current study we used latent profile analysis (LPA) to construct profiles according to employed adult's feelings of perceiving and living out calling. A large sample of employed adults completed surveys at three time points over a six-month period. LPA was used to construct profiles at Time 1 and Time 2 and group differences among the profiles were examined according to job and life satisfaction at Time 2 and Time 3, respectively. At Time 1 and Time 2, a four-profile solution emerged as the best fit to the data with the following profiles: Enacted (high perceiving, high living), Average (average scores on both), Absent (low perceiving, low living), and Unanswered (high perceiving, low living). At both time points, participants in the Absent and Unanswered groups had significantly lower job and life satisfaction compared to the Enacted and Average groups three and six months later. Additionally, at both time points participants in the Unanswered group had lower job satisfaction, but not life satisfaction, than those in the Absent group three and six months later. Post hoc analyses suggested that participants in the Unanswered group may have more limited access to opportunity by way of lower levels of educational attainment, annual household income, and social class compared to most other profile groups. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

在当前的研究中，我们使用潜在轮廓分析 (LPA) 根据受雇成年人感知和实现呼唤的感觉来构建轮廓。大量就业成年人样本在六个月内的三个时间点完成了调查。LPA 用于在时间 1 和时间 2 构建档案，并分别根据时间 2 和时间 3 的工作和生活满意度检查档案之间的组差异。在时间 1 和时间 2，四个配置文件解决方案最适合具有以下配置文件的数据：制定（高感知，高生活），平均（两者的平均得分），缺席（低感知，低生活）和未回答（高感知，低生活）。在这两个时间点，与三个月和六个月后的执行组和平均组相比，缺席组和未回答组的参与者的工作和生活满意度显着降低。此外，在两个时间点，未回答组的参与者的工作满意度低于三个月和六个月后缺席组的参与者，但生活满意度却没有。事后分析表明，与大多数其他概况组相比，未回答组的参与者可能因受教育程度、家庭年收入和社会阶层较低而获得机会的机会更有限。讨论了对未来研究和实践的影响。比缺席组的人在 3 个月和 6 个月后。事后分析表明，与大多数其他概况组相比，未回答组的参与者可能因受教育程度、家庭年收入和社会阶层较低而获得机会的机会更有限。讨论了对未来研究和实践的影响。比缺席组的人在 3 个月和 6 个月后。事后分析表明，与大多数其他概况组相比，未回答组的参与者可能因受教育程度、家庭年收入和社会阶层较低而获得机会的机会更有限。讨论了对未来研究和实践的影响。