当前位置: X-MOL 学术Trauma, Violence, & Abuse › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What About the Men? A Critical Review of Men’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse ( IF 6.595 ) Pub Date : 2022-01-30 , DOI: 10.1177/15248380211043827
Kelly Scott-Storey 1 , Sue O’Donnell 1 , Marilyn Ford-Gilboe 2 , Colleen Varcoe 3 , Nadine Wathen 2 , Jeannie Malcolm 1 , Charlene Vincent 1
Affiliation  

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a health problem affecting people of all genders and other social locations. While IPV victimization of cis-gendered women has been widely researched, how men conceptualized or experience IPV victimization, and the variations in their experiences of IPV, has not been thoroughly examined. In this critical review of men’s experiences of IPV, an extensive search of peer reviewed literature was conducted using multiple database (Cochrane database, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycgINFO, and Google Scholar) as well as the gray literature. We critically reviewed examining the conceptual foundations of IPV victimization among men. The influence or gender roles and societal expectation on men’s experiences and perceptions of IPV victimization and their help-seeking behavior are explored. Current knowledge about types, tactics, and patterns of IPV against men and the health and social consequences of IPV are addresses. Additionally, the conceptual and empirical limitations of current research are discussed, including the tendency to compare only the prevalence rates of discrete incidents of abuse among women versus men; the use of IPV measures not designed to capture men’s conceptualizations of IPV; and the lack of attention given to sex and gender identity of both the victim and perpetrator. Future research priorities that address these limitations and seek to strengthen and deepen knowledge about IPV among men are identified.



中文翻译:

男人呢?对男性亲密伴侣暴力经历的批判性回顾

亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 是一个影响所有性别和其他社会场所的人的健康问题。虽然对顺性别女性的 IPV 受害进行了广泛研究,但男性如何概念化或体验 IPV 受害,以及他们对 IPV 体验的差异,尚未得到彻底研究。在这篇对男性 IPV 经历的批判性审查中,使用多个数据库(Cochrane 数据库、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycgINFO 和 Google Scholar)以及灰色文献对同行评审文献进行了广泛搜索。我们批判性地审查了男性 IPV 受害的概念基础。探讨了男性对 IPV 受害的经历和看法以及他们的求助行为的影响或性别角色和社会期望。当前关于类型的知识,IPV 针对男性的策略和模式以及 IPV 的健康和社会后果是地址。此外,还讨论了当前研究的概念和经验局限性,包括仅比较女性与男性之间离散虐待事件的流行率的趋势;使用并非旨在捕捉男性对 IPV 概念化的 IPV 措施;以及对受害者和施暴者的性别和性别认同缺乏关注。确定了解决这些限制并寻求加强和加深男性对 IPV 知识的未来研究重点。包括仅比较女性与男性之间离散虐待事件发生率的趋势;使用并非旨在捕捉男性对 IPV 概念化的 IPV 措施;以及对受害者和施暴者的性别和性别认同缺乏关注。确定了解决这些限制并寻求加强和加深男性对 IPV 知识的未来研究重点。包括仅比较女性与男性之间离散虐待事件发生率的趋势;使用并非旨在捕捉男性对 IPV 概念化的 IPV 措施;以及对受害者和施暴者的性别和性别认同缺乏关注。确定了解决这些限制并寻求加强和加深男性对 IPV 知识的未来研究重点。

更新日期:2022-01-30
down
wechat
bug