Numerous publications and analyses conducted in various cultures lead to the conclusion that the latent structure of schemas is not unambiguous. The latest proposal by Bach et al. (2017a) includes 18 schemas and four domains; however, a five domain structure is also acceptable.

The aim of the research was to directly compare both proposals based on the research of a large group of healthy people.

The schema questionnaire YSQ-S3 was completed by 2348 people aged 18–81 years, of whom women constituted slightly over 54%.

CFA analyses have demonstrated a poor fit to the data of all analysed models, with the model of four correlated domains, which is also characterised by higher loadings (standardised regression loadings), being the closest to fulfil the criteria. Exploratory factor analyses have shown an almost exact reflection of the structure with the assumed four factors; the structure of five factors has not been recreated. The released number of factors indicated a two-factor solution. The additional analysis confirmed positive medium correlations with negative affect and psychopathology symptoms. Negative correlations of self-esteem, positivity scale and positive affect indicate good divergent validity.

The analysis confirms the existence of 18 schemas and supports the new four-domain model of the latent structure of schemas as more appropriate than a model consisting of five domains.

在各种文化中进行的大量出版物和分析得出的结论是，图式的潜在结构并不是明确的。Bach等人的最新提议。(2017a) 包括 18 个模式和 4 个域；然而，五域结构也是可以接受的。

该研究的目的是根据对一大群健康人的研究直接比较这两种建议。

模式问卷 YSQ-S3 由 2348 名 18-81 岁的人完成，其中女性占略高于 54%。

CFA 分析表明与所有分析模型的数据拟合不佳，四个相关域的模型也具有较高的负载（标准化回归负载），是最符合标准的模型。探索性因素分析表明，假设的四个因素几乎准确地反映了结构；五个因素的结构没有被重建。公布的因素数量表明了一个双因素解决方案。额外的分析证实了与负面影响和精神病理学症状的正中相关性。自尊、积极量表和积极影响的负相关表明良好的发散效度。

分析证实了 18 个模式的存在，并支持模式潜在结构的新四域模型比由五个域组成的模型更合适。