To date, the COVID-19 pandemic remains widespread globally, placing a heavy burden on healthcare systems around the world. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) improves oxygenation and reduces the need for endotracheal intubation in comparison with standard oxygen therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 [1]. During HFNC treatment, the prone position is associated with a significant benefit on oxygenation, but the low compliance of awake patients limits the clinical application of the prone position [2]. The lateral position may also be associated with beneficial effects of gas exchange, especially in unilateral lesions [3]. Although there are studies evaluating the efficacy of both prone and lateral positioning [4, 5], comparative studies on the efficacy of prone and lateral positions in HFNC patients with severe COVID-19 are rarely reported.

In this single-center prospective study, a total of 10 severe COVID-19 patients were included in the treatment center for severe COVID-19 patients in Heilongjiang Province of China. The severe COVID-19 patients in our study were those admitted to the ICU with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg. Patients in supine position (0.5 h), left lateral position (1.5 h), supine position (0.5 h), right lateral position (1.5 h), supine position (0.5 h) , and prone position (1.5 h) treatment sequence. Blood oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were observed at each time point, and blood gas analysis was performed. (Fig. 1).

PaO₂/FiO₂ and PaO₂ improved in left lateral, right lateral, and prone position compared with supine position (⁺P < 0.05 vs supine 0.5 h, ^*P < 0.05 vs supine 2.5 h, ^#P < 0.05 vs supine 4.5), and the improvement degree of PaO₂/FiO₂ and PaO₂ in left and right lateral position was less than that of prone position (^&P < 0.05 vs supine prone 5 h, ^xP < 0.05 vs supine prone 6h)

Full size image

SAS v9.4 software was used for statistical analysis. Normally distributed quantitative data are described by the mean ± standard deviation (x ± s). The P values of pairwise comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method. The results showed that PaO₂/FiO₂ and PaO₂ improved in the left lateral, right lateral and prone positions compared with the supine position. There was no significant difference between the left and right lateral positions, and it was independent of dominant side decubitus, but the improvement degree of PaO₂/FiO₂ and PaO₂ was less than that of the prone position. There was no significant difference in oxygen saturation or respiration rate among different decubitus positions.

In conclusion, in HFNC patients with severe COVID-19, alternating left and right lateral positions improved oxygenation function. When the prone position is not tolerated for long periods of time, prone and lateral position alternating can be used to improve oxygenation.

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

1. 1.

   Tu GW, Liao YX, Li QY, Dong H, Yang LY, Zhang XY, Fu SZ, Wang RL. Prone positioning in high-flow nasal cannula for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia: a pilot study. Ann Transl Med 2020;8(9):598. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3005.

2. 2.

   Le MQ, Rosales R, Shapiro LT, Huang LY. The down side of prone positioning: the case of a coronavirus 2019 survivor. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(10):870–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001530.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

3. 3.

   Hewitt N, Bucknall T, Faraone NM (2016) Lateral positioning for critically ill adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD007205. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007205.pub2.

4. 4.

   Schifino G, de Grauw AJ, Daniele F, Comellini V, Fasano L, Pisani L. Effects of prone and lateral position in non-intubated patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. Pulmonology. 2021;27(2):167–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.10.015.

   CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar

5. 5.

   Retucci M, Aliberti S, Ceruti C, Santambrogio M, Tammaro S, Cuccarini F, Carai C, Grasselli G, Oneta AM, Saderi L, Sotgiu G, Privitera E, Blasi F. Prone and lateral positioning in spontaneously breathing patients With COVID-19 pneumonia undergoing noninvasive helmet CPAP treatment. Chest. 2020;158(6):2431–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.006.

   CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Not applicable.

This work was supported by the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Treatment and Diagnosis Technology Research Project of the Heilongjiang Provincial Science and Technology Department and Provincial Natural Science Foundation Outstanding Youth Project (NO. JQ2021H003).

1. Yang Chong and Chuanchuan Nan contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.23 Youzheng Street, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang Province, China

   Yang Chong, Mingyan Zhao & Kaijiang Yu

2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang Province, China

   Chuanchuan Nan, Wenjing Mu & Changsong Wang

3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, No.1017 Dongmen North Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China

   Chuanchuan Nan

1. Yang ChongView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Chuanchuan NanView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Wenjing MuView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

4. Changsong WangView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

5. Mingyan ZhaoView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

6. Kaijiang YuView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YC, CN, MZ, KY, and CW conceived and designed the study. YC and CW collected and analyzed the data. CN and CW wrote the manuscript. WM polished the manuscript. MZ, KY, and CW reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changsong Wang, Mingyan Zhao or Kaijiang Yu.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, code number kyk2020003.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

Cite this article

Chong, Y., Nan, C., Mu, W. et al. Effects of prone and lateral positioning alternate in high-flow nasal cannula patients with severe COVID-19. Crit Care 26, 28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03897-2

Download citation

• Received: 09 January 2022

• Accepted: 11 January 2022

• Published: 25 January 2022

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03897-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative