ABSTRACT

Energy transitions have been framed in environmental-economic terms, which shaped their scale and design. A strategic frame has emerged, however, with strategic energy security and geopolitical considerations penetrating governmental rationalities. An analysis of strategic framing allows advancing the debate on energy transitions, opening up unexplored avenues for their upscaling and unpacking critical linkages between national policy goals. In the case of Greece, although the strategic framing has started informing governmental rationality, the energy transition is still framed predominantly in environmental-economic terms. Thus, Greece continues to miss out on the opportunities the strategic framing of energy transitions presents for consolidating the country’s energy security and geopolitical stand.

摘要

能源转型是从环境经济角度构建的，这决定了它们的规模和设计。然而，一个战略框架已经出现，战略能源安全和地缘政治考虑渗透到政府的理性中。对战略框架的分析可以推进关于能源转型的辩论，为它们的升级和解开国家政策目标之间的关键联系开辟未开发的途径。就希腊而言，尽管战略框架已经开始影响政府的理性，但能源转型仍然主要是在环境经济方面。因此，希腊继续错失能源转型战略框架为巩固该国能源安全和地缘政治立场所带来的机遇。