INTRODUCTION In line with the growing attention to mental health and stress in children, the present study analyzed the existence of differentiated profiles of coping in response to everyday stressors. The study also examined whether the identified profiles differed in levels of self-compassion. METHOD 487 children (9 - 12 years old), selected by convenience sampling, participated in the study. A cross-sectional, ex post facto design was used. RESULTS Four coping profiles were identified: a profile with low use of coping strategies (LCP), a profile with predominantly approach coping strategies (ACP), a profile with high use of all coping strategies (HMP) and a profile with moderate use of all strategies (MMP). The ACP and HMP profiles demonstrated significantly higher levels of positive self-compassion, whereas the HMP, LCP and MMP profiles demonstrated significantly higher levels of negative self-compassion than the ACP profile. CONCLUSIONS These findings make it possible to determine the profiles of children who are more and less functional in terms of their psychological resources for coping with day-to-day stress. This may encourage the development of more individualized interventions in order to prevent childhood stress.

中文翻译：

---

应对概况及其与童年自我同情的关系。

引言随着对儿童心理健康和压力的日益关注，本研究分析了应对日常压力源的不同应对方式的存在。该研究还检查了所识别的个人资料是否在自我同情的水平上有所不同。方法 487 名儿童（9-12 岁），通过便利抽样选出，参加了研究。使用了横截面、事后设计。结果 确定了四种应对模式：低使用应对策略 (LCP) 的模式、主要采用接近应对策略 (ACP) 的模式、高度使用所有应对策略 (HMP) 的模式和适度使用所有应对策略的模式策略（MMP）。ACP 和 HMP 配置文件显示出显着更高水平的积极自我同情，而 HMP，LCP 和 MMP 配置文件显示出比 ACP 配置文件显着更高水平的负面自我同情。结论 这些发现使我们能够确定在应对日常压力的心理资源方面功能越来越弱的儿童的概况。这可能会鼓励开发更加个性化的干预措施，以防止儿童压力。