This paper discusses the extent to which the parties may use their freedom to choose the law governing their contract under the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts and Arab laws, namely whether they can make a partial or multiple choice of laws. While this question is straightforwardly answered in the affirmative by the Hague Principles, it is debatable under (most) Arab laws. After discussion of the definition of dépeçage of contract, this paper presents the provisions of dépeçage of contract under comparative and international law, including the Hague Principles, and then under Arab laws. It concludes that Arab conflict of laws rules concerning contract should be reformed according to the best practices embodied in this regard by the Hague Principles.

本文讨论了当事人可以在多大程度上根据《国际商事合同法律选择海牙原则》和阿拉伯法律自由选择适用其合同的法律，即他们是否可以做出部分或多项法律选择。虽然海牙原则对这个问题的直接回答是肯定的，但在（大多数）阿拉伯法律下是有争议的。在讨论了合同解除的定义后，本文介绍了比较法和国际法（包括海牙原则）以及阿拉伯法下的合同解除规定。它的结论是，关于合同的阿拉伯冲突法规则应根据海牙原则在这方面体现的最佳实践进行改革。