当前位置: X-MOL 学术Harv. Law Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Keeping Our Distinctions Straight: A Response to Originalism: Standard and Procedure
Harvard Law Review ( IF 3.5 ) Pub Date : 2022-01-20
Hon. Andrew S. Oldham

Introduction Let’s start at the end, the very end. “If ‘[l]aw and philosophy are both in the distinction business,’” Stephen Sachs’s Originalism: Standard and Procedure concludes, “we ought to keep our distinctions straight. Distinguishing standards from decision procedures will help.”[footnote-short-crop]Stephen…

中文翻译:

保持我们的区别:对原创性的回应:标准和程序

简介 让我们从最后开始,最后。“如果'[法律] 和哲学都在区分业务中,'”斯蒂芬萨克斯的原始主义:标准和程序总结道,“我们应该保持我们的区别。将标准与决策程序区分开来会有所帮助。”[footnote-short-crop]Stephen…
更新日期:2022-01-20
down
wechat
bug