In the context of growing calls for a new law criminalising cyberflashing – the digital distribution of penis images to another without consent – this article makes the case for a comprehensive, ‘consent-based’ criminal offence specifically targeting cyberflashing. It justifies this approach by examining the core wrongs of cyberflashing and suggests draft legislative text for such an offence. In making this case, the article analyses and rejects the Law Commission’s recent proposal for a ‘motive-based’ cyberflashing law. Ultimately, it is argued that while the Law Commission's proposal is a welcome recognition of the harms of cyberflashing and need for reform, it does not go far enough to offer the redress victim-survivors are seeking, nor does it provide an appropriate normative foundation for education and preventative initiatives.

在越来越多的呼声越来越高的背景下，新的法律将网络闪烁（即未经同意将阴茎图像以数字方式分发给另一个人）定为犯罪，本文提出了一项专门针对网络闪烁的全面、“基于同意”的刑事犯罪的理由。它通过审查网络闪现的核心错误来证明这种方法的合理性，并建议为此类罪行起草立法文本。在提出此案时，该文章分析并拒绝了法律委员会最近提出的“基于动机”的网络闪现法的建议。最后，有人争辩说，虽然法律委员会的提议是对网络刷写的危害和改革必要性的令人欢迎的承认，但它还不足以提供受害者-幸存者正在寻求的补救，也没有提供适当的规范基础教育和预防措施。