ABSTRACT

Scoping reviews and rapid reviews are intentional approaches to systematically synthesize research. In sport and exercise psychology, scoping reviews can summarize information to describe what is known on a relevant topic. Rapid reviews offer accelerated knowledge synthesis through a streamlined timely and cost-effective approach that is directed and guided by stakeholders. Both scoping and rapid reviews are used to synthesize the literature, and also to describe and assess conceptual, theoretical, and methodological trends, identify gaps in research and practice, and inform future sport and exercise psychology research and practice directions. We offer evidence-based and field-specific guidelines to conduct scoping reviews and rapid reviews. These types of syntheses in sport and exercise psychology are important for advancing research and practice and highlight the value of collaborations with key stakeholders. Our guidelines will help with the uniformity and dependability of scoping and rapid reviews while also advancing the impact and value of this type of research.

摘要

范围审查和快速审查是系统综合研究的有意方法。在运动和锻炼心理学中，范围审查可以总结信息以描述相关主题的已知信息。快速审查通过由利益相关者指导和指导的精简及时且具有成本效益的方法提供加速的知识合成。范围界定和快速评论都用于综合文献，也用于描述和评估概念、理论和方法论的趋势，确定研究和实践中的差距，并为未来的运动和运动心理学研究和实践方向提供信息。我们提供基于证据和特定领域的指南来进行范围审查和快速审查。运动和运动心理学中的这些类型的综合对于推进研究和实践非常重要，并突出了与主要利益相关者合作的价值。我们的指南将有助于范围界定和快速审查的一致性和可靠性，同时也提高此类研究的影响和价值。