A country's institutional framework plays a crucial role in promoting entrepreneurship, which drives economic growth. Encouraging a minimum level of certainty in ambiguous environments characterized by risk taking is important. Aware of this importance, we analyze the influence of institutional factors on entrepreneurship development. Specifically, we analyze political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, a robust rule of law, the ease of starting a new business, and the ease of obtaining credit. We develop two models to explain the presence and absence of entrepreneurship. To do so, we apply qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to a sample of 48 countries using data sourced from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the Global Innovation Index. The results show that the effect of institutional factors on the level of entrepreneurship varies according to the socioeconomic characteristics of each country. They suggest that a wide range of institutional configurations lead to the presence or absence of entrepreneurship. Although entrepreneurship can be found in unfavorable institutional environments, future research should examine how to formalize such environments as a standardized institutional configuration to shift from necessity to opportunity entrepreneurship. Achieving this shift is relevant for innovation and economic development.

一个国家的体制框架在促进创业、推动经济增长方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在以冒险为特征的模糊环境中鼓励最低程度的确定性很重要。意识到这一重要性，我们分析了制度因素对创业发展的影响。具体而言，我们分析了政治稳定性、政府效率、监管质量、健全的法治、开办新企业的难易度以及获得信贷的难易度。我们开发了两种模型来解释企业家精神的存在和不存在。为此，我们使用来自 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 和 Global Innovation Index 的数据对 48 个国家的样本进行定性比较分析 (QCA)。结果表明，制度因素对创业水平的影响因各国社会经济特征而异。他们认为，广泛的制度配置会导致企业家精神的存在或不存在。虽然创业可以在不利的制度环境中找到，但未来的研究应该研究如何将这种环境正规化为标准化的制度配置，以从必要性创业转向机会创业。实现这一转变与创新和经济发展息息相关。虽然创业可以在不利的制度环境中找到，但未来的研究应该研究如何将这种环境正规化为标准化的制度配置，以从必要性创业转向机会创业。实现这一转变与创新和经济发展息息相关。虽然创业可以在不利的制度环境中找到，但未来的研究应该研究如何将这种环境正规化为标准化的制度配置，以从必要性创业转向机会创业。实现这一转变与创新和经济发展息息相关。