Intersubjectivity is the central concept of the relational paradigm, the most widely employed in contemporary psychoanalysis. Yet we do not have a clear definition of it. Usually it is synonymous with “the interpersonal” and thus indicates the interaction that takes place between two already constituted subjects. In this sense it has little to do with the radical social theory of subjectivation suggested by the term, at least originally, in Husserl’s philosophy. In the original meaning of intersubjectivity, as handed down by Husserl and later developed by Merleau-Ponty, the binary opposition between subjectivity and intersubjectivity is dissolved and transformed into a dialectic relationship. To formulate a clear and distinct, but above all specific, definition of intersubjectivity, we need to reclaim this intuition and translate it into coherent principles of technique. It is also essential to verify whether the models of psychoanalysis proffered as intersubjective actually satisfy this parameter. On the basis of these two simple principles, the variants of psychoanalysis that are labeled intersubjective can be placed along a continuum. Examples are given of “weak” and “strong” intersubjectivity. Paradigmatic of the latter pole is the post-Bionian theory of the analytic field.

主体间性是关系范式的核心概念，在当代精神分析中应用最广泛。然而，我们并没有一个明确的定义。通常它与“人际”同义，因此表示两个已经构成的主体之间发生的相互作用。从这个意义上说，它与这个术语所暗示的激进的主观化社会理论几乎没有关系，至少最初是在胡塞尔的哲学中。在主体间性的本义中，如胡塞尔所传并后来由梅洛-庞蒂所发展的，主体性与主体间性的二元对立被消解并转化为辩证关系。为主体间性制定一个清晰而独特但最重要的是具体的定义，我们需要恢复这种直觉并将其转化为连贯的技术原则。验证作为主体间性提供的精神分析模型是否真正满足这一参数也很重要。在这两个简单原则的基础上，被标记为主体间的精神分析的变体可以沿着一个连续体放置。给出了“弱”和“强”主体间性的例子。后一极的范式是分析场的后比奥尼亚理论。给出了“弱”和“强”主体间性的例子。后一极的范式是分析场的后比奥尼亚理论。给出了“弱”和“强”主体间性的例子。后一极的范式是分析场的后比奥尼亚理论。