This article presents the results of an exploratory study aimed to analyze the contexts in which the use of Non-Traditional ports of cocaine departure and counter-intuitive routes is prioritized, based on the experience of Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Moreover, we show that criminal organizations prioritize the Ports of Buenos Aires, San Antonio and Montevideo, and the counter-intuitive routes that lead to them, because they are spaces that generate incentives linked to the porosity of borders, the lack of control at the ports, and the possibility of exploiting the country’s lack of reputation for drug exportation to re-export cocaine undetected. This study constitutes a precedent for future research on the role of South American Southern Cone ports in cocaine trafficking. We can identify at least four emerging lines of research: 1. Cocaine trafficking from landlocked countries; 2. The role of the waterway Paraná-Paraguay; 3. The link between Non-Traditional ports of cocaine departure and new markets; and 4. Other Non-Traditional Ports of cocaine departure, which are not containerized.

本文介绍了一项探索性研究的结果，该研究旨在根据阿根廷、智利和乌拉圭的经验，分析优先使用可卡因离境和反直觉路线的非传统港口的背景。此外，我们表明犯罪组织优先考虑布宜诺斯艾利斯、圣安东尼奥和蒙得维的亚港口以及通往这些港口的违反直觉的路线，因为它们是产生与边界漏洞、缺乏控制的空间相关的空间。港口，以及利用该国在毒品出口方面缺乏声誉的可能性，在未被发现的情况下再出口可卡因。这项研究为未来研究南美南锥港口在可卡因贩运中的作用奠定了先例。我们可以确定至少四个新兴的研究方向：1。来自内陆国家的可卡因贩运；2. 水路巴拉那-巴拉圭的作用；3. 非传统可卡因出发口岸与新市场的联系；4. 其他非集装箱非传统可卡因出发口岸。