The liberalisation of telecommunications sectors in many countries has brought with it the need to regulate and develop regulatory models for competition. South Korea and Nigeria followed the liberalisation trend of the telecommunications markets in late 1980s and 1990s. Both countries have also established competition laws and adopt various regulatory models. This paper, through a comparative analysis, examines how both countries regulate competition in their telecommunications markets. It argues that their regulatory models have merits and demerits which may affect efficient regulation of competition in the industry. It concludes that notwithstanding the pros and cons of their regulatory models, the regulatory choices are tailored to meet the peculiarities of their markets and reflect the environment in which they are used. Also, the Nigerian model reflects its slow level of telecommunication development and the more sophisticated the industry becomes, it becomes imperative for its regulatory regime to become sector-specific.

许多国家电信部门的自由化带来了监管和发展竞争监管模式的必要性。韩国和尼日利亚紧随 1980 年代末和 1990 年代电信市场的自由化趋势。两国还制定了竞争法并采用了各种监管模式。本文通过比较分析，研究两国如何监管其电信市场的竞争。它认为，他们的监管模式各有利弊，可能会影响行业竞争的有效监管。它的结论是，尽管监管模式各有利弊，但监管选择是为满足其市场的特殊性并反映其使用环境而量身定制的。还，