How physical literacy (PL) is presented on ‘the web’ (i.e. Google) has implications for how health and/ physical education (H/PE) teachers and coaches engage with and understand the concept, and ultimately how it is made to act in practice. This research sheds light on the type of PL content they are likely to encounter in their search via the web. Utilising Venturini's ‘cartography of controversies’ method, the top 100 Google search results for PL were analysed to observe and describe how PL is presented on the web, by whom and in the name of what. Findings show that PL has been ‘framed’ on the web by a heterogeneous network of actors who present different viewpoints, ideologies and suggested practices for PL within and across the contextual ‘spheres’ of education, sport and health. Further, the findings highlight how Google's algorithms prioritise and privilege particular PL viewpoints and ideologies. Consequently, variations in understanding and practices will be evident between H/PE teachers and coaches who only engage with the first page of Google results (top one to 10 URLs) and those who read more broadly. Rather than relying on Google's algorithms or policymakers’ interpretations of PL that commonly serve the interests of the sport and health ‘spheres’ we suggest that H/PE teachers and coaches need to act as ‘knowledge brokers’ and thus be reflexive and aware of the multiple versions of PL that are presented on the web. This is especially important if they use the web as a form of professional development.

如何在“网络”（即 Google）上呈现体育素养 (PL) 对健康和/体育 (H/PE) 教师和教练如何参与和理解这一概念以及最终如何使其付诸实践。这项研究揭示了他们在通过网络搜索时可能遇到的 PL 内容类型。利用 Venturini 的“争议制图”方法，分析了 PL 的前 100 个 Google 搜索结果，以观察和描述 PL 在网络上的呈现方式、由谁以及以什么名义呈现。调查结果表明，PL 已在网络上由异质的参与者网络“框定”，这些参与者在教育、体育和健康的上下文“领域”内和跨上下文“领域”提出不同的观点、意识形态和建议的实践。此外，调查结果突出了谷歌的算法如何优先考虑和特权特定的 PL 观点和意识形态。所以，H/PE 教师和教练在只参与谷歌搜索结果首页（前 1 到 10 个 URL）和阅读更广泛的人之间的理解和实践上的差异会很明显。我们建议 H/PE 教师和教练需要充当“知识经纪人”，从而反思并意识到网络上提供的多个版本的 PL。如果他们将网络用作专业发展的一种形式，这一点尤其重要。算法或政策制定者对 PL 的解释通常服务于体育和健康“领域”的利益 我们建议 H/PE 教师和教练需要充当“知识经纪人”，从而反思并了解 PL 的多个版本在网络上呈现的。如果他们将网络用作专业发展的一种形式，这一点尤其重要。算法或政策制定者对 PL 的解释通常服务于体育和健康“领域”的利益 我们建议 H/PE 教师和教练需要充当“知识经纪人”，从而反思并了解 PL 的多个版本在网络上呈现的。如果他们将网络用作专业发展的一种形式，这一点尤其重要。