Service providers are increasingly asked to identify individuals who are experiencing trafficking and to connect them with resources and support. Nonetheless, identification is complicated by the reality that those who are experiencing trafficking may rarely self-identify, and providers may fail to identify individuals who are experiencing trafficking due to lack of guidance on how to screen for trafficking capably and sensitively. With the aim of guiding practice, we undertook a scoping review to search for and synthesize trafficking screening tools and response protocols. Following the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we located 22 screening tools contained in 26 sources. We included any documents that described or tested human trafficking screening tools, screening or identification protocols, response protocols, or guidelines that were published in any year. All documents were abstracted using a standardized form. Key findings showed that most tools were developed by practice-based and non-governmental organizations located in the U.S. and were administered in the U.S. Few screening tools have been rigorously evaluated. The common types of screening questions and prompts included (a) work conditions; (b) living conditions; (c) physical health; (d) travel, immigration, and movement; (e) appearance and presentation; (f) mental health, trauma, and substance abuse; (g) associations and possessions; and (h) arrests and prior involvement with law enforcement. We were not able to locate specific response protocols that provided step-by-step guidance. Nonetheless, the review revealed available practice-based and research-based evidence to help inform guidance concerning how screening and identification of human trafficking may be administered.

服务提供商越来越多地被要求识别正在遭受贩运的个人，并将他们与资源和支持联系起来。尽管如此，由于遭受人口贩运的人可能很少自我识别，而且由于缺乏关于如何有效和灵敏地筛查人口贩运的指导，提供者可能无法识别遭受人口贩运的个人，因此身份识别变得复杂。为了指导实践，我们进行了范围界定审查，以搜索和综合人口贩运筛查工具和应对方案。在范围审查的 PRISMA 扩展 (PRISMA-ScR) 之后，我们找到了 26 个来源中包含的 22 个筛选工具。我们包括了任何描述或测试人口贩运筛查工具、筛查或识别协议、响应协议的文件，或任何一年发布的指南。所有文件都使用标准化形式进行了抽象。主要调查结果表明，大多数工具是由位于美国的基于实践的非政府组织开发的，并在美国进行管理，很少有筛选工具经过严格评估。常见类型的筛选问题和提示包括 (a) 工作条件；(b) 生活条件；(c) 身体健康；(d) 旅行、移民和移动；(e) 外观和介绍；(f) 心理健康、创伤和药物滥用；(g) 协会和财产；(h) 逮捕和之前参与执法。我们无法找到提供分步指导的具体响应协议。尽管如此，