当前位置: X-MOL 学术Neuroscience of Consciousness › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Perceptual Awareness Scale-recent controversies and debates.
Neuroscience of Consciousness ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-12-15 , DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab044
Morten Overgaard 1 , Kristian Sandberg 2
Affiliation  

Accurate insight into subjective experience is crucial for the science of consciousness. The Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) was created in 2004 as a method for obtaining precise introspective reports for participants in research projects, and since then, the scale has become increasingly popular. This does not mean, of course, that no critiques have been voiced. Here, we briefly recapitulate our main thoughts on the intended PAS usage and the findings of the first decade, and we update this with the latest empirical and theoretical developments. We focus specifically on findings with relevance to whether consciousness is gradual or all-or-none phenomenon, to what should be considered conscious/unconscious, and to whether PAS is preferable to alternative measures of awareness. We respond in detail to some recent, selected articles.

中文翻译:

知觉意识量表——最近的争议和辩论。

准确洞察主观体验对于意识科学至关重要。感知意识量表(PAS)于 2004 年创建,作为研究项目参与者获得精确内省报告的方法,从那时起,该量表变得越来越受欢迎。当然,这并不意味着没有提出批评。在这里,我们简要回顾一下我们对 PAS 预期用途和第一个十年的研究结果的主要想法,并用最新的经验和理论发展对此进行更新。我们特别关注与意识是渐进的还是全有或全无现象、什么应被视为有意识/无意识以及 PAS 是否优于其他意识测量方法相关的发现。我们对一些最近精选的文章进行了详细回应。
更新日期:2021-12-15
down
wechat
bug