当前位置: X-MOL 学术Br. J. Sports Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Isometric exercise versus high-intensity interval training for the management of blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
British Journal of Sports Medicine ( IF 11.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-05-01 , DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104642
Jamie Edwards 1 , Anthony De Caux 1 , James Donaldson 1, 2 , Jonathan Wiles 1 , Jamie O'Driscoll 3
Affiliation  

Objective We aimed to compare the efficacy of isometric exercise training (IET) versus high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in the management of resting blood pressure (BP). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed (MEDLINE), the Cochrane library and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 2000 and 1 September 2020. Research trials reporting the effects of IET or HIIT on resting BP following a short-term intervention (2–12 weeks). Results 38 studies were analysed (18 IET and 20 HIIT), including 1583 (672 IET and 911 HIIT) participants, of which 612 (268 IET and 344 HIIT) were controls. IET produced significantly greater reductions in resting BP compared with HIIT with systolic, diastolic and mean BP effect sizes of 8.50 mm Hg vs 2.86 mm Hg (Q=17.10, p<0.001), 4.07 mm Hg vs 2.48 mm Hg (Q=4.71, p=0.03) and 6.46 mm Hg vs 3.15 mm Hg (Q=4.21, p=0.04) respectively. However, HIIT reduced resting heart rate significantly more than IET (3.17bpm vs 1.34bpm, Q=7.63, p=0.006). Conclusion While both modes are efficacious, IET appears to be the superior mode of exercise in the management of resting BP. However, HIIT may achieve wider physiological benefits, with greater reductions in resting heart rate.

中文翻译:

等长运动与高强度间歇训练的血压管理:系统评价和荟萃分析

目的 我们旨在比较等长运动训练 (IET) 与高强度间歇训练 (HIIT) 在管理静息血压 (BP) 方面的效果。设计系统回顾和荟萃分析。系统搜索了 PubMed (MEDLINE)、Cochrane 图书馆和 SPORTDiscus 的数据源。资格标准 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 1 日期间发表的随机对照试验。报告短期干预(2-12 周)后 IET 或 HIIT 对静息血压影响的研究试验。结果 分析了 38 项研究(18 项 IET 和 20 项 HIIT),包括 1583 名(672 名 IET 和 911 名 HIIT)参与者,其中 612 名(268 名 IET 和 344 名 HIIT)为对照。与 HIIT 相比,IET 对静息血压的降低幅度更大,收缩压、舒张压和平均 BP 效应大小分别为 8.50 mm Hg 和 2。86 mm Hg (Q=17.10, p<0.001), 4.07 mm Hg vs 2.48 mm Hg (Q=4.71, p=0.03) 和 6.46 mm Hg vs 3.15 mm Hg (Q=4.21, p=0.04)。然而,HIIT 降低静息心率的幅度明显大于 IET(3.17bpm vs 1.34bpm,Q=7.63,p=0.006)。结论 虽然两种模式都有效,但 IET 似乎是管理静息血压的最佳运动模式。然而,HIIT 可能会获得更广泛的生理益处,静息心率降低幅度更大。
更新日期:2022-04-13
down
wechat
bug