This paper examines Nuti’s accounts of structural injustice and historical injustice in the light of a political dilemma that confronted Young’s work on structure injustice. The dilemma emerges from a paradox that can be stated simply: justly addressing structural injustice would require that those subject to structural injustice enjoy the kind of privileged position of decision-making power that their being subject to structural injustice denies them. The dilemma thus concerns how to justly address structural injustice. I argue that Nuti’s account is currently unable to provide an adequate theorization of how to address this dilemma because it lacks an account of political solidarity, but also that her account provides important resources for dissolving a dispute between two competing theories of solidarity in a way that facilitates the articulation of an account of political solidarity that is adequate to addressing the political dilemma.

本文根据杨在结构不公正方面的工作所面临的政治困境，研究了努蒂对结构不公正和历史不公正的描述。困境源于一个可以简单表述的悖论：公正地解决结构性不公正需要那些受结构性不公正影响的人享有决策权的特权地位，而他们受结构性不公正的影响而否认他们。因此，困境涉及如何公正地解决结构性不公正问题。我认为 Nuti 的描述目前无法就如何解决这一困境提供足够的理论，因为它缺乏对政治团结的描述，