The current study examined how schoolwide norms came together into distinct profiles and how norm profile membership was linked to adolescent well-being. Using school-level (N = 786) and student-level data (N = 174,587 12th grade students; 52% female; 64% White, 13% Latino, 12% Black, 12% other) from Monitoring the Future (MTF), we identified four distinct school profiles—average, academic, prepped-for-college, party—that had unique patterns of shared norms. Compared with average schools, academic schools (high academics and low substance use and social integration norms) were most advantageous for students, prepped-for-college schools (high academics, substance use, and social integration norms) had both benefits and drawbacks, and party schools (low academics and high substance use and social integration norms) were most detrimental.

中文翻译：

---

聚会、学术还是为大学做准备？使用国家数据的学校规范概况和青少年福祉


目前的研究探讨了全校范围内的规范如何组合成不同的概况，以及规范概况的成员资格如何与青少年的福祉联系起来。使用来自监测未来 (MTF) 的学校级别 ( N = 786) 和学生级别数据 ( N = 174,587 名 12 年级学生；52% 女性；64% 白人，13% 拉丁裔，12% 黑人，12% 其他人)，我们确定了四种不同的学校概况——普通、学术、大学预科、党派——它们具有独特的共同规范模式。与普通学校相比，学术型学校（高学术、低物质使用和社会融合规范）对学生最有利，大学预科学校（高学术、低物质使用和社会融合规范）既有优点也有缺点，党校（学术水平低、物质使用和社会融合规范高）最为有害。