当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Dreams, Morality and the Waking World
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-12-05 , DOI: 10.1111/papq.12397 Robert Cowan 1
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-12-05 , DOI: 10.1111/papq.12397 Robert Cowan 1
Affiliation
Is it ever wrong to cheat in a dream? It has been argued that the conjunction of reasonable claims about dreams with Evaluational Internalism (the view that moral evaluation is determined by factors ‘internal’ to agency, such as intentions) entails a positive answer. This implausible result seemingly provides reason to favour an alternative theory of moral evaluation. I here argue that a wide range of Evaluational Externalist views (which base moral evaluation on factors ‘external’ to agency, such as harms produced) are similarly committed to morality in dreams. I end by identifying implications for theorising about dreams and morality.
中文翻译:
梦境、道德与清醒世界
在梦中作弊是错误的吗?有人认为,将关于梦的合理主张与评价内在主义(认为道德评价由能动性的“内部”因素决定,例如意图)的结合需要一个肯定的答案。这个难以置信的结果似乎提供了支持另一种道德评价理论的理由。我在这里争辩说,范围广泛的评估外在主义观点(道德评估基于能动性的“外部”因素,例如产生的伤害)同样致力于梦中的道德。最后,我确定了关于梦想和道德的理论化的含义。
更新日期:2021-12-05
中文翻译:
梦境、道德与清醒世界
在梦中作弊是错误的吗?有人认为,将关于梦的合理主张与评价内在主义(认为道德评价由能动性的“内部”因素决定,例如意图)的结合需要一个肯定的答案。这个难以置信的结果似乎提供了支持另一种道德评价理论的理由。我在这里争辩说,范围广泛的评估外在主义观点(道德评估基于能动性的“外部”因素,例如产生的伤害)同样致力于梦中的道德。最后,我确定了关于梦想和道德的理论化的含义。