Cross-sector partnerships (CSPs) addressing economic, social, and environmental issues continue to be a vibrant topic in management research and beyond. However, compared to the exogenous factors that drive collaborative advantage through structures and governance, the endogenous problems of collaborating across different institutional logics, residing at the micro-level of interactions among partners from the business, government, and nonprofit sectors, have received scant attention. The preoccupation with success factors often leads to a bias toward the problem-solving capacities of CSPs at the neglect of the considerable barriers to successful collaboration across sectors. This study addresses this shortcoming and extracts an institutional approach of CSPs from an integrative review of the literature combining bibliometric methods with qualitative reviewing. A bibliometric map shows how the literature is divided into several clusters, each addressing a specific type of CSP but not engaging much in exchange with other clusters. Zooming in on the clusters provides a more nuanced picture of how institutional theory has hitherto been applied to CSPs. We build on these pieces of the puzzle and assemble them into a preliminary framework that accounts for inter-institutional conflicts in CSPs and actor-level responses to these conflicts. Our framework introduces a new analytical platform that facilitates multi-level research, bringing the micro-level of individual actors back in and connecting it with institutional frames at the macro-level.

中文翻译：

---

跨部门伙伴关系：绘制领域图并推进制度方法

解决经济、社会和环境问题的跨部门合作伙伴关系 (CSP) 仍然是管理研究及其他领域的一个充满活力的话题。然而，与通过结构和治理推动协作优势的外生因素相比，跨不同制度逻辑的协作的内生问题，存在于企业、政府和非营利部门合作伙伴之间互动的微观层面，很少受到关注. 对成功因素的关注常常导致对 CSP 解决问题能力的偏见，而忽视了跨部门成功合作的巨大障碍。本研究解决了这一缺点，并从结合文献计量方法和定性审查的文献综合审查中提取了 CSP 的制度方法。文献计量图显示了文献如何划分为几个集群，每个集群都针对特定类型的 CSP，但与其他集群的交流并不多。放大集群可以更细致地了解制度理论迄今为止是如何应用于 CSP 的。我们建立在这些拼图的基础上，并将它们组合成一个初步框架，该框架解释了 CSP 中的机构间冲突以及对这些冲突的行动者层面的反应。我们的框架引入了一个新的分析平台，可以促进多层次的研究，