States’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the European Court of Human Rights – Governments’ commitment to reform process – Threats of exit that failed to materialise – Adaptation of Hirschman’s exit–voice–loyalty framework to explain states’ non-exit from the European Court of Human Rights – Sufficiently effective voice, manifestations of loyalty, and high costs of exit as possible reasons behind non-exit – Governments’ inability to achieve change in the Court’s practice unilaterally – Divergent perceptions and expectations of governments – Court’s responsiveness to governments’ concerns – Showing the importance of cautious, incremental changes to accommodate diverse governmental expectations on the role of the European Court of Human Rights

中文翻译：

---

改革取悦：欧洲人权法院不退出的综合解释

各国对欧洲人权法院的表现日益不满 – 政府对改革进程的承诺 – 未能实现的退出威胁 – 调整 Hirschman 的退出-声音-忠诚度框架来解释各国不退出欧洲法院人权 – 足够有效的声音、忠诚的表现和退出成本高可能是不退出背后的原因 – 政府无法单方面改变法院的做法 – 政府的不同看法和期望 – 法院对政府关切的回应– 展示谨慎、渐进式变革的重要性，以适应政府对欧洲人权法院作用的不同期望