In the article by Gulati et al, “2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines,” which published ahead of print on October 28, 2021, and appeared in the November 30, 2021, issue of the journal (Circulation. 2021;144:e•••–e•••. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029), corrections were needed.

On page [e5], left column, third paragraph, last sentence, the reference number has been updated. The sentence read, “The Level of Evidence (LOE) rates the quality of scientific evidence…and other sources (Table 1).⁸” It has been updated to read, “The Level of Evidence (LOE) rates the quality of scientific evidence…and other sources (Table 1).⁴”

On page [e44], in the “Sequential or Add-on Testing: What to Do if Index Test Results are Positive or Inconclusive” section, the paragraphs were misnumbered. The paragraph numbers have been updated to match the numbers in the recommendations table and now read,

The use of FFR-CT is supported by several studies…

Use of CCTA after stress testing can diagnose…

Observational registry data suggest that adding…

After an initial exercise ECG, data support an…

For the symptomatic patients with negative stress…

On page [e48], in the “Recommendation-Specific Supportive Text” section, second paragraph, fourth sentence, the reference number has been updated. The sentence read, “CCTA has a great degree of accuracy…when compared with the standard of ICA.²⁰” It has been updated to read, “CCTA has a great degree of accuracy…when compared with the standard of ICA.¹⁵”

On page [e53], in the “ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members” section, the symbol after Drs Al-Khatib, Brindis, and Ikonomidis has been updated to an asterisk.

On page [e54], in the “Article Information” section, second paragraph, the URL has been updated. The sentence now reads, “The Comprehensive RWI Data Supplement table is available with this article at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029.”

These corrections have been made to the current online version of the article, which is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029.

在 Gulati 等人的文章中，“2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR 胸痛评估和诊断指南：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践联合委员会的报告指南”，于 2021 年 10 月 28 日提前出版，并出现在 2021 年 11 月 30 日的期刊（Circulation .2021;144:e•••–e•••.doi: 10.1161/CIR. 0000000000001029)，需要更正。

在第 [e5] 页，左栏，第三段，最后一句，参考编号已更新。这句话是：“证据水平 (LOE) 对科学证据的质量……以及其他来源进行了评级（表 1）。⁸ ” 已更新为“证据水平 (LOE) 对科学证据的质量进行评级……以及其他来源（表 1）。⁴ ”

在第 [e44] 页上的“顺序或附加测试：如果索引测试结果为肯定或不确定时该怎么办”部分，段落编号错误。段落编号已更新以匹配建议表中的编号，现在阅读，

多项研究支持 FFR-CT 的使用……

压力测试后使用 CCTA 可以诊断……

观察性注册数据表明，添加……

经过初步运动心电图，数据支持……

对于有负面压力的有症状患者……

在第 [e48] 页的“推荐特定支持文本”部分的第二段第四句中，参考编号已更新。这句话是：“CCTA 的准确性很高……与 ICA 的标准相比。²⁰ ” 已更新为“CCTA 具有很高的准确性……与 ICA 的标准相比。¹⁵ ”

在第 [e53] 页的“ACC/AHA 联合委员会成员”部分，Al-Khatib、Brindis 和 Ikonomidis 博士之后的符号已更新为星号。

在页面 [e54] 上，在“文章信息”部分的第二段中，URL 已更新。这句话现在改为：“综合 RWI 数据补充表可与这篇文章一起使用，网址为 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029。”

这些更正已对文章的当前在线版本进行了修正，该版本可在 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029 获得。