Supervisory bodies can intervene in organizational practices that may harm society, but their effectiveness to do so depends on their ability to make decisions reflectively and decisively. Are these tendencies incompatible with each other or can they go together? Can empowering leadership (i.e. participative, coaching, informing behaviors) stimulate reflectiveness and decisiveness? A 10-item Joint Decision-Making Questionnaire was developed and tested among supervisory officers (N = 87) and supervisory board members (N = 158). Reflectiveness and decisiveness were positively correlated, indicating that these tendencies can be reconciled in joint decision-making (Study 1). An examination of 44 supervisory teams further revealed that participative leadership relates to more reflectiveness and decisiveness, via cooperative trust and goal commitment (Study 2). Moreover, teams that experienced this team climate prior to COVID-19 reported that they acted more reflectively and decisively during this crisis (Study 3). Hence, participative leaders can foster reflectiveness and decisiveness, by promoting cooperative trust and goal commitment.

中文翻译：

---

反思性和果断性监督：参与式领导和团队氛围在联合决策中的作用

监管机构可以干预可能危害社会的组织行为，但其有效性取决于其反思性和果断性决策的能力。这些趋势是相互不相容还是可以并存？授权领导（即参与、指导、告知行为）能否激发反思性和果断性？开发了一份包含 10 个项目的联合决策问卷，并在监事会成员（ N = 87）和监事会成员（N= 158）。反思性和果断性呈正相关，表明这些倾向可以在联合决策中得到调和（研究 1）。对 44 个监督团队的检查进一步表明，参与式领导通过合作信任和目标承诺与更多的反思性和果断性相关（研究 2）。此外，在 COVID-19 之前经历过这种团队氛围的团队报告说，他们在这场危机中表现得更加反思和果断（研究 3）。因此，参与式领导者可以通过促进合作信任和目标承诺来培养反思性和果断性。