Thinking skills are mental, behavioral, and strategic mechanisms used in the resolution of concerns and decision-making. Interviewed school staff believed the thinking skill programs promote critical thinking and increased verbal uses, listening carefully, cooperation, confidence, and individuality. In this paper, Effective Teaching Strategies (ETS) are used to improve early childhood thinking skills. The proposed model improves the basic knowledge of students in the learning process of cell metabolism. ETS aimed to study the impact of models for children with differing teaching abilities on critical thinking skills. Observations have shown that teachers' delivery is diverse in open interrogation, challenge, and child discussions. The verbal reasoning and numerical accomplishments of the children showed modest signs of improvement. Change and sustainability conditions included: domestic strategy with thought skills at the core, high-performing career growth and school-wide solution, structured observation, and guidance coaching. This promotes management, trust, collaboration, strategy relationship systems, headteachers, teachers, and children. This paper addresses the relevance of the ETS method in education and teaching that improves the children's thinking skills and performance. The experimental results show that the proposed ETS model enhances an accuracy ratio of 95.61%, a performance ratio of 97.62%, a prediction ratio of 96.35%, a learning rate of 95.26%, an efficiency ratio of 98.14%, an error rate of 33.20%, and behavior analysis ratio of 90.72% compared to other existing approaches.

思维技能是用于解决问题和决策的心理、行为和战略机制。接受采访的学校工作人员认为，思维技能课程可促进批判性思维并增加口头使用、仔细聆听、合作、自信和个性。在本文中，有效教学策略 (ETS)用于提高幼儿的思维能力。所提出的模型提高了学生在细胞代谢学习过程中的基础知识。ETS 旨在研究不同教学能力的儿童模型对批判性思维技能的影响。观察表明，教师在公开审讯、挑战和儿童讨论中的授课方式多种多样。孩子们的语言推理和数字成绩显示出适度的改善迹象。变化和可持续性条件包括：以思维技能为核心的国内战略、高绩效职业发展和全校解决方案、结构化观察和指导辅导。这促进了管理、信任、协作、战略关系系统、校长、教师和儿童。本文探讨了 ETS 方法在教育和教学中的相关性，以提高儿童的思维能力和表现。实验结果表明，所提出的ETS模型提升了95.61%的准确率、97.62%的性能比、96.35%的预测率、95.26%的学习率、98.14%的效率比、33.20的错误率%，与其他现有方法相比，行为分析率为 90.72%。