This article seeks to provide a response to the Aloneness Argument Against Classical Theism proposed by Joseph C. Schmid and Ryan T. Mullins. This response focuses on showing the unsoundness of the argument once the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity is reformulated within the essentialist aspectival framework provided by the Aspectival Account. Formulating a response to this argument will thus also serve the further purpose of providing an extension of the Aspectival Account and a needed revision of the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity, which can aid others in their quest to further clarify the nature of this doctrine.

中文翻译：

---

孤独性论证：一个方面的回应

本文旨在对 Joseph C. Schmid 和 Ryan T. Mullins 提出的反对古典有神论的孤独论证做出回应。一旦在 Aspectival Account 提供的本质主义方面框架内重新制定了神圣简单的教义，这个回应的重点是展示论证的不合理性。因此，针对这一论点制定回应也将有助于提供对天象解释的扩展和对神圣简单教义的必要修订，这可以帮助其他人进一步澄清这一教义的性质。