The International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Criminal Court are two very different entities that simultaneously apply international humanitarian law but do so after their own perspectives. This article proposes a cautious yet critical approach to some of their divergent interpretations (conflict classification, the difference between direct and active participation in hostilities, intra-party sexual and gender-based violence, and the notion of attack) and examines how the broader legal system copes with these points of divergence. The analysis considers the institutional characteristics of these two organizations and the pluralistic nature of international humanitarian law as well as its dynamic rapport with international criminal law in order to highlight the versatility needed to face the challenges posed by contemporary armed conflicts.

中文翻译：

---

红十字国际委员会和国际刑事法院：将国际人道法变成一条双头蛇？

红十字国际委员会和国际刑事法院是两个截然不同的实体，它们同时适用国际人道法，但从各自的角度出发。本文对他们的一些不同解释（冲突分类、直接和积极参与敌对行动之间的区别、党内性暴力和基于性别的暴力以及攻击的概念）提出了一种谨慎但批判性的方法，并研究了更广泛的法律系统应对这些分歧点。