The movement of largely affluent urban or suburban populations to rural areas for specific lifestyle amenities is transforming the social and ecological compositions of rural landscapes. This transformation is evident in the biophysical changes to receiving landscapes, but also the increasing fragmentation of land use goals, skills and motivations among these new amenity migrants. In the context of cross-property management, which requires landholders to cooperate and agree on management goals, the fragmentation of land uses and management values presents significant obstacles for protecting economic and natural resources. This paper focuses on invasive plants as one cross-property management issue that is complicated by amenity migration. In particular, we investigate the claim that amenity migrants’ individual or ‘property-centric’ approach to land management worsens cross-property management issues through a disinterest in cross-property management problems, or by exercising management practices that perpetuate existing management problems. Despite the seemingly unambiguous claim in the literature that property-centrism impedes cross-property management, the precise characteristics and functions of this disposition remain largely absent. Drawing on 25 participant interviews with property-centric amenity migrants on the south coast of New South Wales, Australia, we address this gap by detailing the formation of property-centric management and how it manifests in the management attitudes and practices of amenity migrants. Our analysis of property-centric management identifies both the barriers and opportunities for addressing invasive plant management, and in doing so, provides recommendations for how land managers may be better equipped to respond to cross-property management problems in rural-amenity landscapes.

大量富裕的城市或郊区人口迁移到农村地区以获得特定的生活方式设施，正在改变农村景观的社会和生态构成。这种转变在接收景观的生物物理变化中很明显，但在这些新的宜居性移民中，土地使用目标、技能和动机日益分散。在需要土地所有者合作并就管理目标达成一致的跨产权管理背景下，土地用途和管理价值的分散为保护经济和自然资源带来了重大障碍。本文将入侵植物作为一个因设施迁移而复杂化的跨财产管理问题。特别是，我们调查了这样一种说法，即舒适性移民的个人或“以财产为中心”的土地管理方法通过对跨财产管理问题不感兴趣，或通过实施使现有管理问题长期存在的管理实践而恶化了跨财产管理问题。尽管文献中似乎毫不含糊地声称财产中心主义阻碍了跨财产管理，但这种倾向的确切特征和功能在很大程度上仍然缺失。通过对澳大利亚新南威尔士州南海岸以财产为中心的便利设施移民的 25 名参与者访谈，我们通过详细说明以财产为中心的管理的形成以及它如何体现在便利设施移民的管理态度和实践中来解决这一差距。