当前位置: X-MOL 学术Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
COVID-19 related differences in the uptake and effects of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2021-11-10 , DOI: 10.1017/s1352465821000448
Ian Li 1 , Michael Millard 1, 2 , Hila Haskelberg 1 , Megan Hobbs 1, 2, 3 , John Luu 1 , Alison Mahoney 1, 2
Affiliation  

Background:The impacts of COVID-19 for people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be considerable. Online cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) programmes provide scalable access to psychological interventions, although the effectiveness of iCBT for OCD during COVID-19 has not been evaluated.Aim:This study investigated the uptake and effectiveness of iCBT for OCD (both self- and clinician-guided courses) during the first 8 months of the pandemic in Australia (March to October 2020) and compared outcomes with the previous year.Method:1,343 adults (824/1343 (61.4%) female, mean age 33.54 years, SD = 12.00) commenced iCBT for OCD (1061 during the pandemic and 282 in the year before) and completed measures of OCD (Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) and depression (Patient Health Questionaire-9) symptom severity, psychological distress (Kessler-10), and disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) pre- and post-treatment.Results:During COVID-19, there was a 522% increase in monthly course registrations compared with the previous year, with peak uptake observed between April and June 2020 (a 1191% increase compared with April to June 2019). OCD and depression symptom severity were similar for the COVID and pre-COVID groups, although COVID-19 participants were more likely to enrol in self-guided courses (versus clinician-guided). In both pre- and during-COVID groups, the OCD iCBT course was associated with medium effect size reductions in OCD (g = 0.65–0.68) and depression symptom severity (g = 0.56–0.65), medium to large reductions in psychological distress (g = 0.77–0.83) and small reductions in disability (g = 0.35–.50).Conclusion:Results demonstrate the considerable uptake of online psychological services for those experiencing symptoms of OCD during COVID-19 and highlight the scalability of effective digital mental health services.

中文翻译:

基于互联网的认知行为疗法对强迫症症状的吸收和效果与 COVID-19 相关的差异

背景:COVID-19 对强迫症 (OCD) 患者的影响可能相当大。在线认知行为疗法 (iCBT) 计划提供了可扩展的心理干预途径,尽管尚未评估 iCBT 在 COVID-19 期间对强迫症的有效性。目的:本研究调查了 iCBT 对强迫症(自我和临床医生)的吸收和有效性- 指导课程)在澳大利亚大流行的前 8 个月(2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 10 月),并将结果与​​上一年进行比较。方法:1,343 名成年人(824/1343(61.4%)女性,平均年龄 33.54 岁,标清= 12.00)开始针对强迫症的 iCBT(大流行期间为 1061 人,前一年为 282 人)并完成了强迫症(维度强迫症量表)和抑郁症(患者健康问卷 9)症状严重程度、心理困扰(Kessler-10)的测量,以及残疾(WHO 残疾评估表)治疗前后。结果:在 COVID-19 期间,与上一年相比,每月课程注册增加了 522%,在 2020 年 4 月至 2020 年 6 月期间观察到峰值吸收(a与 2019 年 4 月至 2019 年 6 月相比增加了 1191%)。尽管 COVID-19 参与者更有可能参加自学课程(相对于临床医生指导),但 COVID 和 COVID 前组的强迫症和抑郁症状严重程度相似。在 COVID 之前和期间的组中,G= 0.65–0.68) 和抑郁症状严重程度 (G= 0.56–0.65),心理困扰的中到大减少(G= 0.77–0.83)和残疾的小幅减少(G= 0.35–.50)。结论:结果表明,在 COVID-19 期间出现强迫症症状的人大量使用在线心理服务,并突出了有效数字心理健康服务的可扩展性。
更新日期:2021-11-10
down
wechat
bug