当前位置: X-MOL 学术Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The dinosaur that still roars
Catheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-11-09 , DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29969
James C. Blankenship 1
Affiliation  

  • Rotational atherectomy (RA) and orbital atherectomy (OA) are both effective in ablating calcified lesions in preparation for coronary stenting. It remains unclear, which is superior.
  • This meta-analysis of eight non-randomized studies comparing OA and RA finds that RA causes fewer dissections and perforations but OA is associated with fewer myocardial infarctions, mortalities, and target vessel revascularizations.
  • Limitations of this meta-analysis prevent any firm conclusions about which are superior. Experience with one device or the other may be more important than which is chosen.


中文翻译:

仍在咆哮的恐龙

  • 旋转斑块切除术 (RA) 和眼眶斑块切除术 (OA) 均能有效消融钙化病变,为冠状动脉支架置入术做准备。目前还不清楚,哪个更好。
  • 这项对八项比较 OA 和 RA 的非随机研究的荟萃分析发现,RA 导致的夹层和穿孔较少,但 OA 与较少的心肌梗死、死亡率和靶血管血运重建相关。
  • 这项荟萃分析的局限性阻止了任何关于哪个更好的确切结论。使用一种设备或另一种设备的经验可能比选择哪种设备更重要。
更新日期:2021-11-09
down
wechat
bug