当前位置: X-MOL 学术Human Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Industries › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Pilot decision-making during a dual engine failure on take-off: Insights from three different decision-making models
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-11-09 , DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20944
Katie J. Parnell 1 , Rachael A. Wynne 1 , Katherine L. Plant 1 , Victoria A. Banks 1 , Thomas, G.C. Griffin 1 , Neville A. Stanton 1
Affiliation  

Commercial airline pilots are required to make efficient, justifiable, and safety-critical decisions when faced with adverse events such as engine failures. Although these are rare events, the consequences are severe, and the pilot response is critical. This paper reviews pilot decision-making when faced with a dual engine failure on take-off using three different decision models; the Recognition Primed Decision Model, Decision Ladders and the Perceptual Cycle Model. In-depth interviews with eight experienced airline pilots were conducted to capture their decision-making processes in response to a dual engine failure on take-off event. The analysis of these interviews using the three different decision models provide recommendations for a proposed decision assistant. The different decision models are discussed in relation to the insight they can bring to developing a future decision assistant tool within the flight deck of commercial aircraft.

中文翻译:

起飞时双引擎故障期间的飞行员决策:来自三种不同决策模型的见解

商业航空公司的飞行员在面临发动机故障等不利事件时,需要做出高效、合理和安全关键的决策。虽然这些都是罕见的事件,但后果很严重,飞行员的反应至关重要。本文回顾了飞行员在起飞时面临双引擎故障时的决策,使用了三种不同的决策模型;识别引导决策模型、决策阶梯和感知循环模型。对八位经验丰富的航空公司飞行员进行了深入访谈,以了解他们在起飞时双引擎故障的决策过程。使用三种不同的决策模型对这些访谈进行分析,为提议的决策助手提供建议。
更新日期:2021-11-09
down
wechat
bug