当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asian Journal of International Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Palestine's Accession to Geneva Convention III: Typology of Captives Incarcerated by Israel
Asian Journal of International Law ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-11-08 , DOI: 10.1017/s2044251321000229
Mutaz M. QAFISHEH 1 , Ihssan Adel MADBOUH 2
Affiliation  

Upon the 2014 State of Palestine's accession to Geneva Convention III, captured Palestinians who took part in belligerent acts against the occupier should be treated as prisoners of war due to the fact that they belong to a party to an armed conflict. These individuals fall under three categories: members of security forces, affiliates of armed resistance groups, and uprisers who fight the occupant spontaneously on an individual basis. Contrary to established rules of IHL, Israel does not make any distinction regarding the status of these three types. Unilateral Israeli treatment of its captives does not hold water under international law. Such actions may trigger liability based on international criminal law, particularly as the ICC decided in 2021 that it possesses jurisdiction to investigate crimes occurring in the territory of Palestine. The mere fact of confining prisoners of war after the cessation of hostilities may constitute a ground for criminal prosecution.

中文翻译:

巴勒斯坦加入日内瓦第三公约:被以色列监禁的俘虏类型

2014 年巴勒斯坦国加入日内瓦第三公约后,被俘的巴勒斯坦人因属于武装冲突一方而参与了对占领者的交战行为,因此应被视为战俘。这些人分为三类:安全部队成员、武装抵抗组织的附属机构以及在个人基础上自发与居住者作战的起义者。与国际人道法的既定规则相反,以色列对这三种类型的地位没有任何区别。根据国际法,以色列对其俘虏的单方面待遇是站不住脚的。此类行为可能会引发基于国际刑法的责任,特别是国际刑事法院于 2021 年决定其拥有调查在巴勒斯坦领土上发生的犯罪的管辖权。
更新日期:2021-11-08
down
wechat
bug