In four studies (N = 1176), we examined whether negativity towards feminists varies based on the specific ideology endorsed: liberal feminism (i.e., the belief that gender equality can be achieved through adequate changes within societies) or radical feminism (i.e., the belief that gender equality can only be achieved by reconstructing the whole social system). In Study 1, college students rated radical female feminists as less warm than liberal female feminists and a control target group (animal rights activists). Study 2 replicated the difference between ratings of radical and liberal feminists with Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers and further demonstrated that male feminist targets were not subject to the negativity associated with radical feminism. Study 3 with MTurk workers found an indirect effect of radical feminism on lower perceived hireability and suitability for a job, due to lower perceived warmth. Lastly, Studies 1 and 4 with Prolific workers showed that negative evaluations of radical feminists persisted even after controlling for perceived extremity. Together, the findings in this paper demonstrate that radical feminists faced more negative evaluations than other types of feminists, suggesting the importance of considering feminist beliefs when studying the stereotypes associated with feminists in psychological research.

在四项研究中（N = 1176），我们研究了对女权主义者的负面看法是否因认可的特定意识形态而异：自由女权主义（即认为性别平等可以通过社会内部的适当变革来实现）或激进女权主义（即认为性别平等只能通过重建整个社会系统来实现）。在研究 1 中，大学生认为激进女权主义者不如自由女权主义者和控制目标群体（动物权利活动家）热情。研究 2 复制了亚马逊机械土耳其 (MTurk) 工人对激进和自由女权主义者的评级之间的差异，并进一步证明男性女权主义者的目标不受与激进女权主义相关的负面影响。对 MTurk 员工进行的研究 3 发现，由于感知热情较低，激进女权主义对较低的感知可雇用性和工作适合性产生了间接影响。最后，针对多产工人的研究 1 和 4 表明，即使在控制了感知的极端之后，对激进女权主义者的负面评价仍然存在。总之，本文的研究结果表明，激进女权主义者比其他类型的女权主义者面临更多的负面评价，这表明在心理学研究中研究与女权主义者相关的刻板印象时考虑女权主义信仰的重要性。