ABSTRACT

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the quality and validity of Family Drawings (FD) with an Attachment-Based Coding System in assessing attachment representations among pre-school and school-age children. A literature search in notable databases identified 645 records, of which 20 were eligible after screening and quality assessment. Results showed: 1) ABCD attachment distribution in community children was: 48% secure, 20% avoidant, 21% ambivalent, 11% disorganized. Security prevailed both in classifications and Fury et al.’ scales. 2) No significant differences according to the cultural background; 3) At-risk/clinical children showed higher insecurity than community ones using scales; 4) Girls were more secure than boys. In conclusion, FD may be a culture-fair method to assess attachment representations in children. Global scales seem more reliable than ABCD classifications for discriminating at-risk and clinical children, but further studies on these groups are needed.

摘要

进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析，以评估具有基于附件编码系统的家庭绘图 (FD) 在评估学龄前和学龄儿童的附件表示方面的质量和有效性。在著名数据库中进行的文献检索确定了 645 条记录，其中 20 条在筛选和质量评估后符合条件。结果显示：1）社区儿童的ABCD依恋分布为：48%安全，20%回避，21%矛盾，11%杂乱无章。安全性在分类和 Fury 等人中都占主导地位。秤。2）根据文化背景没有显着差异；3）高危/临床儿童比使用量表的社区儿童表现出更高的不安全感；4）女孩比男孩更安全。总之，FD 可能是一种评估儿童依恋表征的文化公平方法。