With the United Kingdom having finally withdrawn from the European Union, and with a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement in place to begin to manage their economic relationship, it might be thought that the constitutional drama of ‘Brexit’ was finally at an end. Yet the longer-term constitutional implications of Brexit and its repatriation of the European regulatory state are becoming apparent. This is particularly evident in the decision of the UK Government to legislate for a United Kingdom Internal Market (UKIM). The analysis here advances two claims: first, the creation of a statutory internal market represents a strategy to ‘de-constitutionalise’ the governance of the internal market; and second, as an instrument of ‘economic unionism’, the United Kingdom Internal Market Act is disruptive of, and for, ‘collaborative unionism’ within the political and territorial constitution of the UK.

中文翻译：

---

英国内部市场法案后的经济工会主义治理

随着英国最终退出欧盟，并制定了新的贸易和合作协议以开始管理他们的经济关系，可以认为“英国退欧”的宪法戏剧终于结束了。然而，英国脱欧及其对欧洲监管国家的遣返对宪法的长期影响正变得越来越明显。这在英国政府为英国内部市场 (UKIM) 立法的决定中尤为明显。这里的分析提出了两个主张：首先，建立法定内部市场代表了一种“去宪法化”内部市场治理的策略；其次，作为“经济工会主义”的工具，英国内部市场法对