当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitor- to Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase 3b Trial
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology ( IF 13.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-12-01 , DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021050628
Klemens Budde 1 , Rohini Prashar 2 , Hermann Haller 3 , Maria C Rial 4 , Nassim Kamar 5 , Avinash Agarwal 6 , Johan W de Fijter 7 , Lionel Rostaing 8 , Stefan P Berger 9 , Arjang Djamali 10 , Nicolae Leca 11 , Lisa Allamassey 12 , Sheng Gao 12 , Martin Polinsky 12 , Flavio Vincenti 13
Affiliation  

Background

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are standard of care after kidney transplantation, but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and reduced long-term graft survival. Belatacept, a selective T cell costimulation blocker, is approved for the prophylaxis of kidney transplant rejection. This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

Stable adult kidney transplant recipients 6–60 months post-transplantation under CNI-based immunosuppression were randomized (1:1) to switch to belatacept or continue treatment with their established CNI. The primary end point was the percentage of patients surviving with a functioning graft at 24 months.

Results

Overall, 446 renal transplant recipients were randomized to belatacept conversion (n=223) or CNI continuation (n=223). The 24-month rates of survival with graft function were 98% and 97% in the belatacept and CNI groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 0.8; 95.1% CI, –2.1 to 3.7). In the belatacept conversion versus CNI continuation groups, 8% versus 4% of patients experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), respectively, and 1% versus 7% developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), respectively. The 24-month eGFR was higher with belatacept (55.5 versus 48.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with CNI). Both groups had similar rates of serious adverse events, infections, and discontinuations, with no unexpected adverse events. One patient in the belatacept group had post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Conclusions

Switching stable renal transplant recipients from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression was associated with a similar rate of death or graft loss, improved renal function, and a numerically higher BPAR rate but a lower incidence of dnDSA.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: A Study in Maintenance Kidney Transplant Recipients Following Conversion to Nulojix® (Belatacept)-Based, NCT01820572



中文翻译:

肾移植受者从钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂到基于 Belatacept 的维持性免疫抑制的转变:一项随机 3b 期试验

背景

钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂 (CNI) 是肾移植后的标准治疗,但它们与肾毒性和长期移植物存活率降低有关。Belatacept 是一种选择性 T 细胞共刺激阻滞剂,被批准用于预防肾移植排斥反应。该 3 期试验评估了在肾移植受者中从基于 CNI 的转换为基于 belatacept 的维持免疫抑制的有效性和安全性。

方法

在基于 CNI 的免疫抑制下移植后 6-60 个月稳定的成人肾移植受者被随机(1:1)转换为 belatacept 或继续使用他们已建立的 CNI 进行治疗。主要终点是 24 个月时移植物存活的患者百分比。

结果

总体而言,446 名肾移植受者被随机分配至贝拉西普转换组(n = 223)或 CNI 继续(n = 223)。belatacept 和 CNI 组的 24 个月移植物功能存活率分别为 98% 和 97%(校正差异,0.8;95.1% CI,–2.1 至 3.7)。在 belatacept 转换组与 CNI 继续组中,分别有 8% 和 4% 的患者经历了活检证实的急性排斥反应 (BPAR),分别有 1% 和 7% 的患者产生了新的供体特异性抗体 (dnDSAs )。贝拉西普的 24 个月 eGFR 更高(55.5 对比 48.5 ml/min/1.73 m 2与 CNI)。两组的严重不良事件、感染和停药发生率相似,没有意外不良事件。belatacept 组中的一名患者患有移植后淋巴增生性疾病。

结论

将稳定的肾移植受者从基于 CNI 的免疫抑制转换为基于 belatacept 的免疫抑制与类似的死亡率或移植物丢失率、肾功能改善以及 BPAR 率在数值上更高但 dnDSA 发生率较低相关。

临床试验注册名称和注册编号:转换为基于 Nulojix®(Belatacept)后维持性肾移植接受者的研究,NCT01820572

更新日期:2021-11-30
down
wechat
bug