Though there is an abundance of literature on the relationship between the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court ('ICC') and the immunities of non-state parties to the ICC Statute, the arrest process under Part 9 of the ICC Statute has not yet been addressed from the perspective of international organizations law. Yet, the ICC is certainly an international organization, and its arrest process is comparable to other organizations’ activities, e.g. the United Nations Security Council’s smart sanctions process. It is therefore argued that a clarification of the legal relationship between the cooperating state and the ICC under the general law of international organization would be a logical premise for further discussion of the relationship between the ICC’s jurisdiction and the immunities of non-state parties to the ICC Statute. The importance of this kind of analysis has become apparent as a consequence of the employment of the Surrogation of Jurisdiction theory by the Appeals Chamber of the ICC in its Al Bashir judgment. This theory formed an essential part of the judgment. An assessment of this theory from the perspective of the law of international organizations shows both the potential and the limitation of the theory. It will, thus, give us a more comprehensive understanding of the theory’s legal implications in the context of the enforcement of ICC arrest warrants against organs of non-state parties to the Statute who enjoy immunity under customary international law.

中文翻译：

---

谁执行国际刑事法院的逮捕令？

尽管关于国际刑事法院 ('ICC') 的管辖权与《国际刑事法院规约》的非国家当事方的豁免权之间的关系有大量文献，但《国际刑事法院规约》第 9 部分下的逮捕程序尚未得到证实。从国际组织法的角度来处理。然而，国际刑事法院无疑是一个国际组织，其逮捕过程与其他组织的活动类似，例如联合国安理会的智能制裁过程。因此认为，在国际组织一般法下明确合作国与国际刑事法院之间的法律关系，将是进一步探讨国际刑事法院管辖权与非国家当事人豁免权关系的逻辑前提。国际商会章程。由于国际刑事法院上诉分庭在其 Al Bashir 判决中采用了代理管辖权理论，这种分析的重要性变得显而易见。这一理论构成了判断的重要组成部分。从国际组织法的角度对这一理论的评价既显示了该理论的潜力，也显示了其局限性。因此，它将让我们更全面地了解该理论在针对根据习惯国际法享有豁免权的《规约》非缔约国机关执行国际刑事法院逮捕令时的法律含义。这一理论构成了判断的重要组成部分。从国际组织法的角度对这一理论的评价既显示了该理论的潜力，也显示了其局限性。因此，它将让我们更全面地了解该理论在针对根据习惯国际法享有豁免权的《规约》非缔约国机关执行国际刑事法院逮捕令时的法律含义。这一理论构成了判断的重要组成部分。从国际组织法的角度对这一理论的评价既显示了该理论的潜力，也显示了其局限性。因此，它将让我们更全面地理解该理论在针对根据习惯国际法享有豁免权的《规约》非缔约国机关执行国际刑事法院逮捕令的背景下的法律含义。