当前位置: X-MOL 学术ICSID Rev. Foreign Invest. Law J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Canepa v Spain1Some Observations Regarding the Relationship between ICSID Arbitrators and Third-Party Funders
ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-04 , DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa027
Jean-Christophe Honlet , Nandakumar Srivatsa

On 19 November 2019, the unchallenged arbitrators of the Canepa v Spain Tribunal, acting as the deciding authority under Article 58 of the ICSID Convention,4 rejected Spain’s proposal to disqualify the Claimants-appointed arbitrator in the case.5 One of the grounds for disqualification advanced by Spain pertained to the relationship between the Claimants’ appointee and a third-party funder.6 To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published ICSID decision regarding a party’s attempt to unseat an arbitrator on the basis of his or her relationship with a third-party funder.7

中文翻译:

Canepa 诉西班牙1关于 ICSID 仲裁员与第三方资助者关系的一些观察

2019 年 11 月 19 日,作为 ICSID 公约第 58 条规定的裁决机构的Canepa 诉西班牙法庭的未受质疑仲裁员,4拒绝了西班牙关于取消申请人指定仲裁员资格的提议。5西班牙提出的取消资格的理由之一与索赔人的指定人与第三方资助者之间的关系有关。6据作者所知,这是第一次公布的 ICSID 决定,涉及一方试图根据他或她与第三方资助者的关系取消仲裁员席位。7
更新日期:2021-08-04
down
wechat
bug