We offer an ethnographic account of how forest conservation is diversely assembled at the contiguous Tambopata National Reserve and Bahuaja Sonene National Park, biodiversity hotspots in the southern Peruvian Amazon. In so doing, and revising Elinor Ostrom and collaborators' Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework, we put together a theory framework of forest institutional change, informed by assemblage perspectives. Given the context of high world society interest in the Amazon and low spatial reach of the Peruvian state, charismatic wildlife watching and scientific investigation, Brazil nuts harvest, and gold mining shape the customizing of conservation assemblages. Institutional change is the result of how Peruvian State and diverse local groups adapt, resist and reconfigure through the ongoing practices of assemblage, which are pulled by conservation and commodification forces. Responding to the IAD framework, we propose institutional diversity fundamentally means that practices of assemblage are neither uniform, nor static.

我们提供了一个关于森林保护如何在秘鲁亚马逊南部的生物多样性热点连续的坦博帕塔国家保护区和 Bahuaja Sonene 国家公园进行多样化组合的人种学描述。在这样做的过程中，并修订了 Elinor Ostrom 和合作者的制度分析与发展 (IAD) 框架，我们将森林制度变迁的理论框架放在一起，以组合观点为基础。考虑到世界社会对亚马逊的高度关注和秘鲁国家的低空间范围，富有魅力的野生动物观察和科学调查、巴西坚果收获和金矿开采塑造了保护组合的定制。制度变革是秘鲁国家和不同地方团体如何通过持续的组装实践来适应、抵制和重新配置的结果，受守恒和商品化力量的拉动。针对 IAD 框架，我们提出制度多样性从根本上意味着组合的实践既不是统一的，也不是静态的。