当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Cardiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Screening for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in primary care using Holter monitoring and intermittent, ambulatory single-lead electrocardiography
International Journal of Cardiology ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-21 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.021
Evert P M Karregat 1 , Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp 2 , Anne C Bouwman 1 , Steven B Uittenbogaart 1 , Jelle C L Himmelreich 1 , Wim A M Lucassen 1 , Sébastien P J Krul 3 , Henri A M van Kesteren 4 , Justin G L M Luermans 5 , Henk C P M van Weert 1 , Henri E J H Stoffers 2
Affiliation  

Background: Timely detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is important because of its increased risk of thrombo-embolic events. Single time point screening interventions fall short in detection of paroxysmal AF, which requires prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring, usually using a Holter. However, traditional 24-48 h Holter monitoring is less appropriate for screening purposes because of its low diagnostic yield. Intermittent, ambulatory screening using a single-lead electrocardiogram (1 L-ECG) device can offer a more efficient alternative.

Methods: Primary care patients of ≥65 years participated in an opportunistic screening study for AF. We invited patients with a negative 12 L-ECG to wear a Holter monitor for two weeks and to use a MyDiagnostick 1 L-ECG device thrice daily. We report the yield of paroxysmal AF found by Holter monitoring and calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the 1 L-ECG device's built-in AF detection algorithm with the Holter monitor as reference standard.

Results: We included 270 patients, of whom four had AF in a median of 8.0 days of Holter monitoring, a diagnostic yield of 1.5% (95%-CI: 0.4–3.8%). In 205 patients we performed simultaneous 1 L-ECG screening. For diagnosing AF based on the 1 L-ECG device's AF detection algorithm, sensitivity was 66.7% (95%-CI: 9.4–99.2%), specificity 68.8% (95%-CI: 61.9–75.1%), positive predictive value 3.1% (95%-CI: 1.4–6.8%) and negative predictive value 99.3% (95%-CI: 96.6–99.9%).

Conclusion: We found a low diagnostic yield of paroxysmal AF using Holter monitoring in elderly primary care patients with a negative 12 L-ECG. The diagnostic accuracy of an intermittently, ambulatory used MyDiagnostick 1 L-ECG device as interpreted by its built-in AF detection algorithm is limited.



中文翻译:

使用 Holter 监测和间歇性动态单导联心电图筛查初级保健中的阵发性心房颤动

背景:房颤(AF)的及时检测很重要,因为它增加了血栓栓塞事件的风险。单时间点筛查干预不足以检测阵发性房颤,这需要长时间的心电图监测,通常使用动态心电图。然而,由于诊断率低,传统的 24-48 小时动态心电图监测不太适合筛查目的。使用单导联心电图 (1 L-ECG) 设备进行间歇性动态筛查可以提供更有效的替代方案。

方法:≥65 岁的初级保健患者参加了一项针对 AF 的机会性筛查研究。我们邀请 12 L-ECG 阴性的患者佩戴 Holter 监护仪两周,并每天三次使用 MyDiagnostick 1 L-ECG 设备。我们报告了通过 Holter 监测发现的阵发性 AF 的发生率,并以 Holter 监测作为参考标准,计算了 1 L-ECG 设备内置 AF 检测算法的诊断准确性。

结果:我们纳入了 270 名患者,其中 4 名在中位 8.0 天的动态心电图监测中患有 AF,诊断率为 1.5%(95%-CI:0.4-3.8%)。在 205 名患者中,我们同时进行了 1 次 L-ECG 筛查。对于基于 1 L-ECG 设备的 AF 检测算法诊断 AF,敏感性为 66.7%(95%-CI:9.4-99.2%),特异性 68.8%(95%-CI:61.9-75.1%),阳性预测值 3.1 % (95%-CI: 1.4–6.8%) 和阴性预测值 99.3% (95%-CI: 96.6–99.9%)。

结论:我们发现在 12 L-ECG 阴性的老年初级保健患者中使用 Holter 监测对阵发性 AF 的诊断率较低。由其内置的 AF 检测算法解释的间歇性动态使用的 MyDiagnostick 1 L-ECG 设备的诊断准确性是有限的。

更新日期:2021-11-17
down
wechat
bug