当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Midlife Cardiovascular Health and Robust versus Frail Late-Life Status: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences ( IF 5.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-20 , DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab310
Priya Palta 1 , Michael Griswold 2 , Radhikesh Ranadive 2 , Karen Bandeen-Roche 3 , Aaron R Folsom 4 , Natalia Petruski-Ivleva 5 , Sheila Burgard 6 , Anna Kucharska-Newton 7, 8 , B Gwen Windham 2
Affiliation  

Background We examined the relationship of midlife cardiovascular health (CVH) with late-life robustness among men and women and the impact of survivorship bias on sex-differences in robustness. Methods Prospective analysis of 15,744 participants aged 45-64 (Visit 1 median age: 54 years, 55% female, 27% Black) in 1987-1989 from the population-based ARIC Study. CVH was operationalized according to the Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) metric of health behaviors (smoking, weight, physical activity, diet, cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose); each behavior was scored as ideal (2 points), intermediate (1 point), or poor (0 points) and summed. Late-life robust/pre-frail/frailty was defined at Visit 5 (2011-2013). Multinomial regression estimated relative prevalence ratios (RPR) of late-life robustness/pre-frailty/frailty/death across overall midlife LS7 score and components, for the full Visit 1 sample. Separate analyses considered Visit 5 survivors only. Results For each one-unit greater midlife LS7 score, participants had a 37% higher relative prevalence of being robust versus frail (overall RPR=1.37, [95% CI: 1.30-1.44]; women=1.45 [1.36-1.54]; men=1.24 [1.13-1.36]). Among the full Visit 1 sample, women had a similar one-level higher robustness category prevalence (RPR=1.35 [95% CI: 1.32-1.39]) than men (RPR=1.31 [95% CI: 1.27-1.35]) for every one-unit higher midlife LS7 score. Among survivors, men were more likely to be robust than women at lower LS7 levels; differences were attenuated and not statistically different at higher midlife LS7 levels. Conclusions Midlife CVH is positively associated with robustness in late-life among men and women. Accounting for mortality in part explains documented sex-differences in robustness across all levels of LS7.

中文翻译:

中年心血管健康和健壮与虚弱的晚年状态:社区动脉粥样硬化风险 (ARIC) 研究

背景 我们检查了男性和女性中年心血管健康 (CVH) 与晚年稳健性的关系,以及幸存者偏差对稳健性性别差异的影响。方法对 1987-1989 年基于人群的 ARIC 研究中 15,744 名 45-64 岁参与者(访视 1 中位年龄:54 岁,55% 女性,27% 黑人)进行前瞻性分析。CVH 根据 Life's Simple 7 (LS7) 健康行为指标(吸烟、体重、体力活动、饮食、胆固醇、血压和葡萄糖)进行操作;每个行为被评为理想(2 分)、中等(1 分)或差(0 分)并相加。在访问 5 (2011-2013) 中定义了晚年健壮/衰弱前/虚弱。对于完整的就诊 1 样本,多项回归估计了整个中年 LS7 评分和组成部分的晚年稳健性/衰弱前/衰弱/死亡的相对患病率 (RPR)。单独的分析仅考虑访问 5 幸存者。结果 对于中年 LS7 评分每增加一个单位,参与者的健壮与虚弱的相对患病率高 37%(总体 RPR=1.37,[95% CI:1.30-1.44];女性=1.45 [1.36-1.54];男性=1.24 [1.13-1.36])。在完整的就诊 1 样本中,女性的稳健性类别患病率(RPR=1.35 [95% CI: 1.32-1.39])比男性(RPR=1.31 [95% CI: 1.27-1.35])相似一个单位更高的中年 LS7 分数。在幸存者中,在 LS7 水平较低的情况下,男性比女性更有可能强壮;在较高的中年 LS7 水平上,差异有所减弱且无统计学差异。结论 中年 CVH 与男性和女性晚年的健壮性呈正相关。对死亡率的解释部分解释了 LS7 所有级别的健壮性的性别差异。
更新日期:2021-10-20
down
wechat
bug