This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing scales for fatalism, along with information regarding their methodological robustness. A systematic search was conducted in PsycINFO (PsycARTICLES and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences), PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Articles were selected if they described a Self-Report questionnaire properly designated for assessing fatalism (both original developments and further validations), if they included a measure in which fatalism is the core construct rather than a subscale of a multidimensional scale, and if they were published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language. The methodological quality of the retrieved instruments was appraised using Skinner’s (1981) validity evidence framework. From the starting number of 1,210 records, the screening process led to 16 studies examining the psychometric properties of eight instruments. Our findings offer a general overview of the available fatalism scales, providing evidence of the variety of ways in which fatalism has been conceptualized and assessed. The systematic analysis, the rigorous methodological appraisal, and the critical discussion about the reported scales’ features may represent a useful guide for scholars and practitioners in choosing measures with a high level of quality for their research aims. Limitations and directions for future research are also discussed.

中文翻译：

---

测量宿命论的工具：系统评价。

本系统评价旨在提供对现有宿命论量表的全面概述，以及有关其方法稳健性的信息。在 PsycINFO（PsycARTICLES 和心理学与行为科学）、PubMed、Scopus、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统搜索。如果文章描述了适当指定用于评估宿命论（原始发展和进一步验证）的自我报告问卷，如果它们包含以宿命论为核心结构而不是多维量表的子量表的测量，并且如果它们是发表在同行评议的英文期刊上。使用 Skinner (1981) 的有效性证据框架评估检索到的工具的方法学质量。从 1,210 条记录的起始数量，筛选过程导致了 16 项研究检查了八种仪器的心理测量特性。我们的研究结果提供了可用宿命论量表的一般概述，提供了宿命论被概念化和评估的各种方式的证据。系统分析、严格的方法评估以及对报告量表特征的批判性讨论可能为学者和从业人员选择高质量的测量指标以实现其研究目标提供有用的指导。还讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向。系统分析、严格的方法评估以及对报告量表特征的批判性讨论可能为学者和从业人员选择高质量的测量指标以实现其研究目标提供有用的指导。还讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向。系统分析、严格的方法评估以及对报告量表特征的批判性讨论可能为学者和从业人员选择高质量的测量指标以实现其研究目标提供有用的指导。还讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向。