Arslan et al. (2020) conducted a large-scale, preregistered daily diary study on over 400 normally ovulating women. Of core interest were hypotheses that women's ratings of their partner's sexual attractiveness moderate associations of fertility status with women's own extrapair sexual desires, their own interest in in-pair sex, and their partners' mate retention tactics. The authors claim that "no evidence for moderator effects" (p. 426) was found. In fact, their own analyses reported in their supplementary material show robust evidence for moderation effects. Moreover, a new reanalysis using a more comprehensive composite measure of male partner sexual attractiveness yielded even stronger results. Effect size estimates are consistent with the existence of large, meaningful moderation effects, revealing that this study actually does show evidence of moderation effects. Additional analyses show similarly strong moderator effects on male proprietariness. We discuss the findings in the context of reliance on binary (significant vs. nonsignificant) labels and the pitfalls of underreporting effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

在 Arslan 等人 (2020) 的数据中，通过合作伙伴的吸引力来调节排卵变化的有力证据。

阿尔斯兰等人。(2020) 对 400 多名正常排卵的女性进行了大规模、预先注册的每日日记研究。核心兴趣是假设女性对其伴侣的性吸引力的评级可以调节生育状况与女性自己的超双性欲、她们自己对成对性行为的兴趣以及伴侣的伴侣保留策略之间的关联。作者声称“没有发现调节剂效应的证据”（第 426 页）。事实上，他们在补充材料中报告的分析显示了调节效应的有力证据。此外，使用更全面的男性伴侣性吸引力综合指标进行的新重新分析产生了更强大的结果。效应量估计值与大的、有意义的调节效应的存在一致，揭示这项研究实际上确实显示了调节效应的证据。其他分析显示，对男性的专有性也有类似的强烈调节作用。我们在依赖二元（显着与不显着）标签和漏报效应的陷阱的背景下讨论这些发现。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。